I started writing for I.N.K. in March 2008. With nostalgia and curiosity, I went back to
look at some of my initial posts. I kept
on reading and realized that I was also looking at a history of what has happened
in the field of kids’ nonfiction from then to now. At least, some of its zeitgeist, its ups and
downs.
By 2008 we nonfiction writers had had time to road-test our liberation
from straitjacket association with encyclopedic information. We had seen or written books such as Dance,
Actual Size, and Action Jackson, celebrating the changes that came with cheaper
color printing and more experimental styles and formats. It was no wonder my second post for I.N.K., A Rose by any Other Name? bridled against the confines of the word used to describe our field. I wrote:
As we all know, words matter. So what about the one that describes
our genre of writing: nonfiction. I used to feel just fine about it, but now I
have a slight twinge. After all, it does have a negative point of reference.
The “I’m not fiction” instead of the “I am something” kind of writing…
If you link to the post you can see a discussion of the issue
and the difficulty I and other commenters had trying to find a good solution.
Artistically booming , we were about to take a fall. In June
2008, however, most of us didn’t know that. I’m a
glass-half-full-AND-half-empty type, perhaps I had a premonition. In The Lucky Thing about Friday the 13th, (prompted by my assigned post date) I
amused myself with cheerful grumbling about the luck factor (or lack thereof)
in writing nonfiction for kids. Here is
part of it:
The lucky thing is that schools and libraries can always use
a well-written book to update their collection on a particular subject.
The unlucky thing is that they can’t afford to buy them.
The lucky thing is that you can create books on subjects kids will love.
The unlucky thing is that many publishers can’t imagine marketing nonfiction to the trade market, so the kids don’t find them.
The unlucky thing is that they can’t afford to buy them.
The lucky thing is that you can create books on subjects kids will love.
The unlucky thing is that many publishers can’t imagine marketing nonfiction to the trade market, so the kids don’t find them.
If you click on rest of the post, please note I do end with
the lucky side; I love what I do and have, luckily, managed to make a living at
it.
Nevertheless a few months later, the fan was hit plunging us
into the biggest fiscal crisis since the Great Depression. It hit the book industry the same way it
affected the nation at large. I know
many people whose completed, even paid-for manuscripts were dropped by
publishers looking at a shriveling market with no immediate change in
sight. One of my own was pushed to a pub
date over a year in the future so it could be “supported more successfully.”
Happily unagented for most of my career, I began to think
about the comfort of having an ally. I
started a search for an agent and was shocked by what I found on their web
sites. Another post, Agents-Agents of Change was born.
A personal nadir perhaps, but hope springs and swings
eternal along with changing fortunes for people and professions. In other words, if you stick around long
enough, the pendulum swings. On a
personal level, I had three books come out in 2012. More globally, picture books, declared a dying
form, managed a “rebirth.” YA nonfiction is growing. Nonfiction
books are more frequent winners and honor winners of the Newbery, Printz and
Caldecott.
I’m not exactly sure when the phrase Common Core first
appeared in I.N.K. posts, but it increased exponentially in 2012. My book Skyscraper was included in Math
Reads, Marilyn Burn’s series using actual books to teach math; and I posted about
future models of using our books in the classroom. When Penguin combined The Truth About Poop and Gee Whiz in a new edition, I
wrote about what was lost and gained by very intelligently reissuing these
books in black-and-white digest form for the burgeoning middle grade market.
I wasn’t the only one commenting on the Brave New World of
nonfiction’s role in education. I.N.K.
devoted the whole month of October 2013 to Common Core and nonfiction in the
classroom with a spirited discussion about the author’s role in the process.
Is Common Core going to change the role and status of
nonfiction in our culture? Who
knows. I know more imprints are opening
their lists to it. And I wish we’d have
more time and posts to report on what happens as a result. But it’s been great to have an opportunity to
think and write about all things nonfiction until now. Thank you, I.N.K.
This post, in fact, my tenure at I.N.K. is dedicated to
Linda Salzman, without whom…
4 comments:
Great post, Susan. I loved your perspective on the changing events since all this happened. Let's hope that the coming push-back against the Common Core is primarily about the high-stakes testing, not the reading of nonfiction literature. If I had a crystal ball, I would guess that there will be increasing interest in curation--people will get tired of swimming through the slush and will be looking for material that's a pleasure to read. But then, like you, my glass is always half-full.
Thanks for this warm and nostalgic post, Susan. It made me think back to so many interesting pieces throughout the years. A common thread that I very much appreciate is the fact that the posts were positive and upbeat. When there was reason to take on a particular aspect of publishing, it was professional, not personal. Linda Saltzman set the tone and we writers took off.
What a pleasure to know you all. Thank you.
.
Susan: Your comments reflect my long experience of Life: things get better, then things get worse, then better….. etc. Just need to ride the waves.
Thanks everyone, when I first had the idea for this post I thought of it as an analytic look, but you're right, Susan, it is a nostalgic look too. Curation? Stuff that's a pleasure to read? Hope your crystal ball is right, Vicki. But Gretchen, we don't need a crystal ball to predict the better/worse cycle, do we?
Post a Comment