Today's
guest post is by Karen Blumenthal—author of YALSA Nonfiction Award finalists Bootleg and Steve Jobs:
The Man Who Thought Different—and a committed researcher. Or, maybe, a researcher
who should be committed? Read her post and decide for yourself!
One evening during a research trip
to Washington, D.C., I missed the hotel’s revolving-door entry and slammed into
a glass wall schnoz first.
While I reeled in pain, the guests
in the lobby eyed me as if I'd enjoyed the happy hour a little too much.
Embarrassingly, I was suffering instead from a wicked case of microfilm myopia.
I had only been researching drinking, not actually doing it.
In writing nonfiction for young
people, I know the quality of the research drives the story. But that all-important
work, I've concluded, may be dangerous to your health.
Other afflictions from recent research
were less painful, but almost as embarrassing:
Quarter
hoarding: My obsession won’t make great reality TV, but I have stashed
quarters everywhere, in pockets, wallets, and tote bags, and I won’t share them
with you, even for a desperately needed soft drink. They’re crucial for parking
meters, copiers and lockers for stashing your stuff while you research Al
Capone at the Chicago History Museum.
Research
fog: An ailment closely related to microfilm myopia, this dense stupor sets
in around the fifth hour of reading, especially if you skip lunch to squeeze in
more work during a research library's limited hours. As you emerge from the fluorescent-lit
haze, jabbering about what you have learned, it slowly becomes apparent that no
one you know cares that Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton and Penney founder James
Cash Penney had similar backgrounds.
Library
breath: What is it about libraries that makes your mouth feels like a herd
of camels just ambled across your tongue? Spend too much of the day inside one
of these important (and low-humidity) places of knowledge and you'll find that
your newfound trivia isn't all that will knock people out.
Chronic
nerditis: Finding some new gem online can lead to mysteriously intense,
heart-pounding excitement that will surely bore your family to death. You mean
you can read 1920s magazines online? Find newspapers stories back to the 1850s?
Look at a database instead of those fat green Reader's Guides to Periodicals?
Score!
Wait—what? You've never heard of
the Reader's Guide to Periodicals?
“Just
one more” syndrome: Now this is when things get really ugly. Researching is
fun; writing, for me, is difficult. So why in the world should I want to stop
searching for good stuff? What if there’s a better anecdote out there? What if
I’ve missed a great example? If only the deadline wasn’t approaching!
Of course, the paper cuts and
smudges on my clothes from newspapers and fresh photocopies are all worth the
trouble when I finally sit down at the computer. Having great stories and
specific detail is crucial to writing for young people because the story must crackle
and pop, and every idea must be crystal clear for readers who have little experience
or context to bring to a subject.
Just try not to get behind me when I
take a break at the coffee shop. I may be paying with quarters.
5 comments:
Karen,
Fabulous post!
Thanks so much for sharing with us!
Anna
Oh yes - skipping lunch because you HAVE to squeeze in more reading before the library locks up for the night! Definitely adds to the foggy head.
Welcome, Karen! I make sure to travel with energy bars (my favorite: NOGii Chocolate/Peanut Butter) for those days of skipping meals. But one of my favorite things about the Library of Congress is their cafeteria. Breaking for lunch there is tasty and refreshing.
Fun post! I think it's neat we can search OLD newspapers online.
Fun post! I think it's neat we can search OLD newspapers online.
Post a Comment