Last month, I blogged a bit about the School Library Journal
Leadership Summit and my preparation to discuss Those Rebels, John and Tom in
light of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
I thought I'd report back on our panel, "Nonfiction at the Fore of the Common Core."
We four authors—Steve Sheinkin, Sally M. Walker,
Deborah Hopkinson, and me—were in excellent company. The room was filled with
librarians passionate about their work. There was a buzz in the room as
the discussion ranged from how to engage tech-savvy readers to how to best set
up the physical space in a library. Also, there was cake.
Our task on the panel was to share how our books (all
nonfiction, all set in the past) were relevant to events today and then to use
specific Common Core Standards as a way of exploring our books. Led by Mary Ann
Cappiello (one of the intrepid members of The Uncommon Corps I blogged about
last month), we dove in.
The discussion was divided into four sections.
Steve began by discussing how Bomb: The Race To Build—And
Steal—The World’s Most Dangerous Weapon remains chillingly relevant today as
many countries around the world monitor Iran’s nuclear future. He added his
hope that his book was relevant in “helping kids become engaged with history.”
Sally then turned to a discussion of a specific CC Standard
on the balance of primary and secondary sources during the research process.
She shared photographs of the prehistoric bones at the center of her book Their
Skeletons Speak: Kennewick Man And The Paleoamerican World, focusing on the
stone spear point embedded in Kennewick Man’s hip bone and discussing how
scientists used computer modeling to analyze whether Kennewick Man—literally—saw
the spear coming.
I talked about another CC Standard on exploring how an
author’s purpose shapes the content and style of a book. I shared how the text
reflects my purpose in Those Rebels, John and Tom of introducing the two men
through the lens of their differences and then showing how they looked past
those differences to find common ground and work together. I followed up by pointing
out the many ways in which Edwin Fotheringham’s art supports this purpose, from
his use of opposites (opposing pages of dark vs. light; action vs. passivity;
loud vs. quiet) to aspects of the book design, such as the fact that the two
men’s profiles face away from each other on the book’s flaps and face toward
each other on the title page.
Finally, Deborah Hopkinson discussed another CC Standard on
analyzing how word choice shapes meaning and tone. Reading a passage from Annie
and Helen, about Annie Sullivan and Helen Keller, she discussed her love of
language and how much the act of reading shapes writing.
The panel was great. I loved listening to and learning from the other authors. I also left inspired to learn more about the Common Core Standards and how I can use them to explore my books with teachers, librarians, and kids.
And if you'd like to read more about the panel, see this write-up in School Library Journal.
5 comments:
The panel discussion sounds fascinating. One thing I've noticed is that my grad students--all teachers--find it very interesting to hear authors' perspectives on their books. They have watched many authors discuss their books on online videos. It really makes a difference to their understanding of the book. So keep these informational sessions and coming. Also, Common Core has made "word choice" an important topic. I am thrilled by this because I think it's so important that readers are aware of the choices authors make when writing.
Thanks for this summary of the panel, Barba. I've heard wonderful things about it and now I know why. I love that Common Core encourages teachers and students to dig deeper and understand our process, so that they can become more knowledgable readers and more skilled writers of nonfiction.
It was a great event, as Barb says, and the best part was the genuine enthusiasm among educators for the kinds of books we're all trying to write!
I, too, love the focus on word choice, and exploring it from a writerly and readerly perspective, Myra. On Friday, when talking about SKULL IN THE ROCK in upstate NY to middle school content teachers & librarians, I noted that throughout the book, Lee the scientist, is referred to as "he." But as soon as the research team starts to study the skeletons found at Malapa, on the first page of chapter 7, the dominant pronoun changes to "we." It is no longer a book about Lee and his work, it's a book about research that every reader is a participant in. A small thing, a pronoun shift, a single letter on the page from "he" to "w." But so powerful as a literary device for the full impact of the book.
Yep, loved the enthusiasm in the room. And I'm with you guys -- word choice is key!
Post a Comment