This post isn’t about the Common
Core or rubrics or other pedagogical concerns. It’s about storytelling, which,
when it comes right down to it, is what all great writing should be—even nonfiction.
Stubby, on display at the Smithsonian Institution |
This past year I’ve had the good
fortune to become an hiStoryteller twice on the same topic. My unusual escort
has made the journey pure pleasure, trotting forward on four feet as he’s led
me back to 1917, across the Atlantic, through the Great War, and home again. As
with so many topics, accident and good fortune led me to discover Stubby, a
stray dog smuggled with American troops to France who returned to the United
States and became a post-war icon. I stumbled across him while doing photo
research for Unraveling Freedom,
another book set during World War I. Even though I was not a dog person, I
could not get this intrepid creature out of my mind, and that meant only one
thing: I was destined to write about him. More than that, I was, apparently,
destined to write about him twice.
First I researched and wrote about Stubby the War Dog for young people and
then, at the request of my publisher, I embarked on another telling of his
tale, this time for adult readers. The National Geographic Society will publish
both books next May.
I’ve learned a lot about
storytelling from these projects. My subject left behind an historical record
riddled with contradictions, omissions, and hyperbole. Just sorting out the narrative
was a job. Figuring out how to share it with two very different audiences was a
challenge, as well. Keeping the story fresh became a particular concern. I knew
I needed to stay in love with the topic for the readers to love it, but, after
writing the first book, I feared I would find myself trapped in a sort of Groundhog Day nightmare for the second
one.
I follow a definite mental and
physical trajectory when writing a book. Part of the challenge is pacing myself
so that I don’t run out of stamina or enthusiasm before the project’s
completion. Once a book is done, there is a natural let-down that shares
kinship with the postpartum feelings of childbirth. Exhaustion. Relief.
Satisfaction. Plus a sense of aimlessness after losing the connection to a goal
long-in-the-making and now achieved. No mother would want to go right back into
labor, and no one ever has to give birth to the same baby twice. Yet there I
was, facing the same topic again.
It turned out that my greatest
challenge was overcoming the sense of panic that gripped me at that prospect.
Once I’d slain the apparition of repetition, I found myself liberated to write
in new ways, from simple things such as the freedom to construct complicated
sentences and use big words to the rewards of writing for an audience that
could appreciate a more sophisticated rendering of the history. I fell in love
with my subject all over again, generating the energy and motivation required to
explore Stubby’s story along new research and writing avenues.
Sometimes I think we forget that
writing, at its best, is storytelling. Writers such as those at I.N.K. don’t park their
passions at their office doors; they infuse their work with them, and that’s
why such incredible books emerge from their fingertips. Nothing but the facts,
true, but the facts can truly inspire—sometimes even twice—when we write from
our hearts as well as from our heads.
In the wake of standards, and
testing, and benchmarks it can be hard to remember that the best reading, the
best writing, the best teaching, and the best learning come when we are most
inspired. My new year’s wish for all is this: May writers, educators, and
students alike be allowed to fall in love with facts through wonderful,
wonderful storytelling.
2 comments:
Well said, Ann. Congratulations on getting both Stubbys done. I look forward to reading them.
This story certainly has captured the imagination of the staff at National Geographic! Stubby has quite a fan club. And so does his storyteller.
Post a Comment