tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post4966690340009640733..comments2024-03-22T01:00:38.320-04:00Comments on I.N.K.: Keeping the FaithLinda Salzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17217322360480267856noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post-54745845439902261422013-06-07T09:16:29.852-04:002013-06-07T09:16:29.852-04:00I think your argument is flawless in this case. Yo...I think your argument is flawless in this case. You were exactly right to include those lines. The fact that they were suggested by a historian makes me certain. I think that this kind of inclusion of feelings or thought, judicially chosen, is perfectly legitimate. I would not want to make a blanket statement. We have to make these decisions on a case-by-case basis. Thanks for this post, Marfé. Gets me on my on-ramp today!--DebDeborah Heiligmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02894150394598699172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post-76564710063029079402013-06-06T13:55:15.645-04:002013-06-06T13:55:15.645-04:00I'm with you. When subjects haven't writt...I'm with you. When subjects haven't written down their thoughts and feelings we can justifably infer them from their actions.Gretchen Woelflehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10350500006005970433noreply@blogger.com