tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post5084062556439202115..comments2024-03-22T01:00:38.320-04:00Comments on I.N.K.: Just for the Fun of ItLinda Salzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17217322360480267856noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post-34659707892334759602008-11-03T08:19:00.000-05:002008-11-03T08:19:00.000-05:00Hmmm... funny.Great post.Now, you've got me thinki...Hmmm... funny.<BR/>Great post.<BR/>Now, you've got me thinking about this.Anna M. Lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01915256522607241235noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1337206901491734394.post-25596940733104516202008-10-30T09:04:00.000-04:002008-10-30T09:04:00.000-04:00Good point, Linda. I do think with nonfiction, tho...Good point, Linda. I do think with nonfiction, though, people use the term, "fun," very liberally -- to define anything that isn't on the opposite side of the spectrum, i.e., "boring." <BR/><BR/>There is a problem with editors all asking for "funny." It's so subjective, and what they really mean is "funny to them." So, how are we supposed to guess that?jamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07859083373087448194noreply@blogger.com